At the end of December, my cat Oliver became sick and was diagnosed with a gallstone that was partially obstructing his bile duct. After this diagnosis, he was put on a medication to dissolve the stone and antibiotics.
It has been 1 month since this issue first started and Oliver has been off the antibiotics for 2 weeks, but he is still doing great. Yesterday, we had a follow-up ultrasound and the vet who performed the ultrasound said the stone has shrunk greatly which is a good sign. She said she would pass this information and a full report to my primary vet.
I was suprised to recieve a phone call from my primary vet today saying that despite the improvements they want to put him back on antibiotics and have him go on perscription diet. I was confused about their reasoning for this so I asked for a copy of the ultrasound report. Based on the findings in the report, I don't see the need for antibiotics or a perscription diet. The vet who performed the ultrasound even said it is unclear whether or not these things would help.
I have asked multiple times if food caused his gallstones the answer has always been no so why should I start using an expensive perscription diet? Additionally, why should he go back on antibiotics when he is doing ok without them?
Of course, if Oliver worsened I would happily put him on antibiotics and try a perscription diet, but I have already spent close to $2,500 and given how well he is doing I don't want to spend hundreds of dollars on something that may or may not help. I feel like my vet was trying to up-charge me and perscribe things that aren't necessary or even beneficial. I am planning on continuing the medication we were pescribed that breaks up the stone, but this experience has left a sour taste in my mouth.
Am I rational in my thinking he doesn't need antibioitics or a perscription diet? Is it a valid reason to switch vets?