| |
|
This filly is labeled "golden dunalino"--golden meaning champagne. She is also displaying the golden dunalino image. As her gene test shows, she is not Ch (neither is either parent). Unless I'm just too tired and making things up, she should be just "dunalino". https://horseeden.com/horse.php?id=19917991 |
|
|
| |
|
Champagne is "gold," not "golden." Golden dunalino is pale palomino + dun. |
|
|
| |
|
I assume you're right, but I think that's super bizarre. Why call it "golden" which is very easily confused with "gold" and which nobody would interpret as pale dunalino? Plus, the golden dunalino art is yellowy like the gold champagne and less pale than the normal one. Thanks for correcting me--glad it's not a bug. Although definitely very misleading labeling :) |
|
|
| |
|
I suppose I could be wrong about it being analogous to pale pally, but that's how I always thought of it. :) |
|
|
| |
 |
Dunalino https://horseeden.com/horse.php?id=19798782
Golden Dunalino https://horseeden.com/horse.php?id=15251773
Gold Dun (Champagne)
https://horseeden.com/horse.php?id=15098569
Just for comparison. I'm not sure the golden is lighter than the regular dunalino, but it may be just that the dun gene modifies the color where it's hard to tell. The primitive markings are definitely less intense, but that happens sometimes even on the same color horse.
|
|
|
| |
|
Thanks for posting the image comparison. Part of my confusion is that it really looks like the gold champagne layer was taken and modified/used somehow to get the golden dunalino image. If you look at the wither markings, extent of the dark color on the face, and yellowy color in the golden dunalino and gold champagne, then compare those to the dunalino, it really seems odd. |
|
|
Sunny
