|
|
Kawasaki Equestrian said:
The smudge brush on Pixlr is very different to that on Photoshop. Even on 1% strength it basically decimates the object. I would not advise using the smudge brush on 100% at all.
https://i.imgur.com/347oLAO.jpg
This is what the smudge brush on 100% does to your image. (Thank you Robert Downey Jr for a pretty example base).
Unfortunately bar using a very, very light blur and then drawing back the details, there isn't much of a way to achieve the same soft effect on Pixlr as there is on Photoshop.
~Running Free~ said: If you use Pixlr you can use the 9fade brush that gives it a smoother appearance. Smudge on strength 100 also helps.
Is that Pixlr? Pixlr looks completely different to that for me
|
|
|
|
|
Kawasaki Equestrian said:
The smudge brush on Pixlr is very different to that on Photoshop. Even on 1% strength it basically decimates the object. I would not advise using the smudge brush on 100% at all.
https://i.imgur.com/347oLAO.jpg
This is what the smudge brush on 100% does to your image. (Thank you Robert Downey Jr for a pretty example base).
Unfortunately bar using a very, very light blur and then drawing back the details, there isn't much of a way to achieve the same soft effect on Pixlr as there is on Photoshop.
~Running Free~ said: If you use Pixlr you can use the 9fade brush that gives it a smoother appearance. Smudge on strength 100 also helps.
I mean strength 100 for the small hairs at size1. Then with a small brush, outline the horse with it and it will smooth it.
|
|
|